Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs Granite 3.1 8b Instruct
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 35.5.
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1186 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1401 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: —, Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.1% |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1145 |
Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1152 |
Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1142 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1099 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | 1145 |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | 1092 |
| LMArena French | 1444 | — |
| LMArena German | 1423 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1423 | 1131 |
Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1438 | 1162 |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1150 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 1129 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Granite 3.1 8b Instruct?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better for coding?
GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13.