Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Gemma 4 31B IT

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 31B IT Google

43.5

Rank #90 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 4 31B IT in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 60.5 to 29.1.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Gemma 4 31B IT specifications
Falcon-180BGemma 4 31B IT
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteGoogle
Noometry Index32.243.5
Released2023-09-062026-04-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.09
Output $ / M tokens—$0.34
Results tracked1635

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 4 31B IT
LMArena WebDev—1366
SciCode—43.4%
WeirdML—52.3%
LMArena Coding—1459
ALE-Bench—925.5

Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 4 31B IT
LMArena Hard Prompts10071448
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13142.74
Kagi LLM Benchmark—63.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—70.6%
CritPt—1.4%
Chess Puzzles—5%
Thematic Generalization—53%
DTBench—82.7%
LMCA—39.3%
Surface Evolver Bench—30.6%
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 4 31B IT
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
LMArena Math—1465
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 4 31B IT
GPQA Diamond—75.8%
SimpleQA Verified—10.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.4%
LMArena Expert—1465
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 4 31B IT
LMArena Vision—1277
LMArena Document—1425

Multilingual Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 4 31B IT
LMArena Non-English10001431
LMArena Chinese—1476
LMArena French—1435
LMArena Russian—1460
LMArena Spanish—1444

Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 4 31B IT
LMArena Instruction Following10471433

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 4 31B IT
LMArena Longer Query—1446

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BGemma 4 31B IT
LMArena Text10541443
LMArena Creative Writing10891415
LMArena Multi-Turn10131452
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1368
EQ-Bench 4—1120

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Gemma 4 31B IT?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemma 4 31B IT share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 4 31B IT has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper