Model comparison

Gemma 4 31B IT vs Pixtral Large

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 31B IT Google

43.5

Rank #90 Confirmed

Pixtral Large Mistral AI

32.2

Rank #259 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 3 categories and Pixtral Large in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 60.5 to 32.9.
  • Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper at $0.09 / $0.34 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Pixtral Large.
  • Gemma 4 31B IT accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Gemma 4 31B IT and Pixtral Large specifications
Gemma 4 31B ITPixtral Large
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index43.532.2
Released2026-04-022024-11-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K128K
Max output33K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.09$2
Output $ / M tokens$0.34$6
Results tracked353

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108), Pixtral Large: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITPixtral Large
LMArena WebDev1366—
SciCode43.4%—
WeirdML52.3%—
LMArena Coding1459—
ALE-Bench925.5—

Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITPixtral Large
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)70.6%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
EnigmaEval—0.8%
Thematic Generalization53%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1448—
DTBench82.7%—
LMCA39.3%—
Surface Evolver Bench30.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.74—

Math Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81), Pixtral Large: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITPixtral Large
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—
LMArena Math1465—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151), Pixtral Large: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITPixtral Large
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
SimpleQA Verified10.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
LMArena Expert1465—

Multimodal Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34), Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITPixtral Large
LMArena Vision12771089
LMArena Document1425—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57), Pixtral Large: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITPixtral Large
LMArena Non-English1431—
LMArena Chinese1476—
LMArena French1435—
LMArena Russian1460—
LMArena Spanish1444—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61), Pixtral Large: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITPixtral Large
LMArena Instruction Following1433—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71), Pixtral Large: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITPixtral Large
LMArena Longer Query1446—

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITPixtral Large
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1368988
LMArena Text1443—
LMArena Creative Writing1415—
EQ-Bench 41120—
LMArena Multi-Turn1452—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Pixtral Large?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B IT or Pixtral Large?

Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.34 per million output tokens; Pixtral Large lists at $2 and $6.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemma 4 31B IT does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Pixtral Large share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper