Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Kimi K2.5 Instant
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 60.8 to 29.3.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 Instant | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.3 (#95)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1483 |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 28.5 (#88)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1443 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 36.6 (#105)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1443 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#121)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1438 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1254 |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.2 (#89)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1406 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1450 |
| LMArena French | — | 1403 |
| LMArena German | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1378 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1448 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.5 (#61)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1430 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.8 (#82)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1435 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.8 (#91)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1379 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1427 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.