Model comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Gemma 4 31B IT
Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 4 31B IT in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 43.2 to 25.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 23.1% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 73.3% for Gemma 4 31B IT.
- Gemma 4 31B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 4 31B IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 43.5 |
| Released | 2024-02-15 | 2026-04-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.09 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.34 |
| Results tracked | 45 | 35 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241), Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 22.2% | 52.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1459 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1366 |
| SciCode | — | 43.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 925.5 |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145), Gemma 4 31B IT: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338), Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1448 |
| DTBench | 59% | 82.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | 142.74 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 70.6% |
| CritPt | — | 1.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 53% |
| LMCA | — | 39.3% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 30.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266), Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1465 |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239), Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | 75.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1465 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 10.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |
Multimodal Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77), Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | 1277 |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
| LMArena Document | — | 1425 |
Multilingual Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174), Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1431 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1476 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | 1435 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1460 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | 1444 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185), Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1433 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |
Long Context Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169), Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1446 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172), Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1443 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1452 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1368 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1120 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Gemma 4 31B IT?
Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Gemma 4 31B IT better for coding?
Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Gemma 4 31B IT share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 4 31B IT has 35.