Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Gemini 1.0 Pro
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
GoogleSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemini 1.0 Pro leads 33.4 to 25.2.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Gemini 1.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 27.3 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | 2023-12-13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1108 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 55.5% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.4% |
Reasoning Falcon-180B leads
Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1109 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | 117.04 |
| DTBench | — | 45.9% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1132 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.2% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 70.6% | 70% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 34% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1059 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1124 |
| LMArena French | — | 1145 |
| LMArena German | — | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1119 |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1114 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1132 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1131 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1139 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.