Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Llama 4 Scout

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Llama 4 Scout Meta

27.7

Rank #330 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Llama 4 Scout in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Llama 4 Scout leads 41.0 to 25.2.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Llama 4 Scout specifications
Falcon-180BLlama 4 Scout
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteMeta
Noometry Index32.227.7
Released2023-09-062025-04-05
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked1643

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 20.2 (#339)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Scout
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9.1%
SciCode—17%
LMArena Coding—1286
BigCodeBench Complete—43.1%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 24.6 (#119)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Scout
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.1%

Reasoning Falcon-180B leads

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Llama 4 Scout: 9.1 (#345)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Hard Prompts10071266
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13129.64
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—36.9%
ARC-AGI-1—0.5%
CritPt—0%
DTBench—57.9%
LMCA—12%
ForecastBench—57.5
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 19.6 (#286)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Scout
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.8%
Omni-MATH—37.3%
LMArena Math—1287
MATH Level 5—62.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0%
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 31.9 (#217)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Scout
GPQA Diamond—51.8%
MMLU-Pro—74.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.7%
GPQA (HELM)—50.7%
LMArena Expert—1235
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 32.2 (#102)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Vision—1118
SpatialViz-Bench—34.2%

Multilingual Llama 4 Scout leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Llama 4 Scout: 41.0 (#212)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Non-English10001252
LMArena Chinese—1255
LMArena French—1282
LMArena German—1272
LMArena Japanese—1206
LMArena Korean—1207
LMArena Russian—1263
LMArena Spanish—1278

Instruction Following Llama 4 Scout leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Llama 4 Scout: 65.8 (#217)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Instruction Following10471248
IFEval—81.8%

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#294)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Scout
Fiction.LiveBench—36%
LMArena Longer Query—1265

Writing & Preference Llama 4 Scout leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Llama 4 Scout: 37.0 (#261)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BLlama 4 Scout
LMArena Text10541279
LMArena Creative Writing10891249
LMArena Multi-Turn10131280
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—783
WildBench—78%

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Llama 4 Scout?

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Llama 4 Scout share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper