Model comparison

Falcon-180B vs Mixtral 8x22B

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Mixtral 8x22B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #333 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mixtral 8x22B leads 36.9 to 29.1.

Side by side

Falcon-180B and Mixtral 8x22B specifications
Falcon-180BMixtral 8x22B
ProviderTechnology Innovation InstituteMistral AI
Noometry Index32.227.1
Released2023-09-062024-04-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—64K
Max output—64K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1634

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMixtral 8x22B
WeirdML—3.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—40.6%
LMArena Coding—1166
BigCodeBench Complete—50.2%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—64.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMixtral 8x22B
Cybench—7.5%

Reasoning Too close to call

Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269), Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Hard Prompts10071150
Epoch Capabilities Index112.13122.03
DTBench—55.1%
ForecastBench—56.3
HellaSwag89%—
LAMBADA79.8%—
PIQA84.9%—
WinoGrande87.1%—

Math Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMixtral 8x22B
Omni-MATH—16.3%
LMArena Math—1184
MATH Level 5—24.2%
GSM8K54.4%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMixtral 8x22B
MMLU70.6%77.8%
GPQA Diamond—34.1%
MMLU-Pro—46%
GPQA (HELM)—33.4%
LMArena Expert—1113
ARC (AI2) Challenge67.8%—
BoolQ89%—
OpenBookQA64.2%—

Multilingual Mixtral 8x22B leads

Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286), Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Non-English10001128
LMArena Chinese—1116
LMArena French—1166
LMArena German—1141
LMArena Japanese—1037
LMArena Korean—1057
LMArena Russian—1158
LMArena Spanish—1151

Instruction Following Mixtral 8x22B leads

Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286), Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Instruction Following10471147
IFEval—72.4%

Long Context Not comparable

Falcon-180B: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query—1144

Writing & Preference Mixtral 8x22B leads

Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295), Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkFalcon-180BMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Text10541162
LMArena Creative Writing10891141
LMArena Multi-Turn10131130
WildBench—71.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Falcon-180B better than Mixtral 8x22B?

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Mixtral 8x22B share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper