Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Pixtral Large
Pixtral Large is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Pixtral Large leads 21.7 to 17.1.
- Pixtral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 24 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Pixtral Large leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1089 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Pixtral Large?
Pixtral Large is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Pixtral Large share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.