Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Qwen3.6 Flash
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 28.4 to 20.9.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 38.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209), Qwen3.6 Flash: 28.4 (#90)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |
Math Too close to call
ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96), Qwen3.6 Flash: 38.0 (#88)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.2 (#90)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | — |
| LMArena French | 1486 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.