Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.1 vs GLM-4.7-Flash

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.1 Baidu

43.8

Rank #83 Confirmed

GLM-4.7-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.8

Rank #180 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and GLM-4.7-Flash in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 47.4.
  • GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.1GLM-4.7-Flash
ProviderBaiduZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index43.838.8
Released—2026-01-19
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—200K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.06
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked1921

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Coding14881383

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.1: —, GLM-4.7-Flash: —

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Search1227—

Reasoning Too close to call

ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14811356
NYT Connections (extended)23.4%—
Chess Puzzles—0%

Math ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Math14811355
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—58.3%

Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Expert14921357
GPQA Diamond—60.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%

Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Non-English14541330
LMArena Chinese15081403
LMArena French14881332
LMArena German14701337
LMArena Korean14271283
LMArena Russian14591332
LMArena Spanish14731350
LMArena Japanese1422—

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14601327

Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14621345

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Text14681351
LMArena Creative Writing14411297
LMArena Multi-Turn14711342
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1125

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.1 better than GLM-4.7-Flash?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.1 or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 40.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and GLM-4.7-Flash share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper