Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Qwen Turbo
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 40.3 to 15.3.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 27.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Qwen Turbo?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.