Model comparison
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 vs Qwen Turbo
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads 38.6 to 15.3.
Side by side
| Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 27.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 41.6 (#122), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1413 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 33.8 (#71), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 75% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1424 | — |
Math Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 38.6 (#134), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1407 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 39.2 (#137), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| Confabulations | 16.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1401 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 39.6 (#58), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1243 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 52.9 (#76), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1419 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | — |
| LMArena French | 1446 | — |
| LMArena German | 1423 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1429 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 74.0 (#107), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 43.1 (#107), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1413 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 62.6 (#72), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1429 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1405 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1501 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1454 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 better than Qwen Turbo?
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.