Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Mixtral 8x7B
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Mixtral 8x7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 34.2.
- Mixtral 8x7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Mixtral 8x7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 27.1 |
| Released | — | 2023-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 32K |
| Max output | — | 32K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 38 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1126 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 39.6% |
| MBPP+ | — | 49.7% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Mixtral 8x7B: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1115 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| DTBench | — | 49.6% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.47 |
| ForecastBench | — | 56.3 |
| HellaSwag | — | 86.7% |
| PIQA | — | 83.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 77.2% |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1147 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 10.5% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10% |
| GSM8K | — | 74.4% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1088 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 33.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 29.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 87.3% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 85.8% |
| TriviaQA | — | 82.2% |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1077 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1055 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1166 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 931 |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | 968 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1090 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1111 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1109 |
| IFEval | — | 57.5% |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1103 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1132 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1109 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1115 |
| WildBench | — | 67.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Mixtral 8x7B?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Mixtral 8x7B better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Mixtral 8x7B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x7B has 38.