Model comparison

ERNIE 5.1 vs Mixtral 8x22B

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.1 Baidu

43.8

Rank #83 Confirmed

Mixtral 8x22B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #333 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 36.9.
  • Mixtral 8x22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.1 and Mixtral 8x22B specifications
ERNIE 5.1Mixtral 8x22B
ProviderBaiduMistral AI
Noometry Index43.827.1
Released—2024-04-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—64K
Max output—64K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1934

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Coding14881166
WeirdML—3.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—40.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—50.2%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—64.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.1: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Mixtral 8x22B
Cybench—7.5%
LMArena Search1227—

Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Hard Prompts14811150
NYT Connections (extended)23.4%—
DTBench—55.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122.03
ForecastBench—56.3

Math ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Math14811184
Omni-MATH—16.3%
MATH Level 5—24.2%

Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Expert14921113
GPQA Diamond—34.1%
MMLU-Pro—46%
GPQA (HELM)—33.4%
MMLU—77.8%

Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Non-English14541128
LMArena Chinese15081116
LMArena French14881166
LMArena German14701141
LMArena Japanese14221037
LMArena Korean14271057
LMArena Russian14591158
LMArena Spanish14731151

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Instruction Following14601147
IFEval—72.4%

Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query14621144

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads

ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Text14681162
LMArena Creative Writing14411141
LMArena Multi-Turn14711130
WildBench—71.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Mixtral 8x22B?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.1 or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 24.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Mixtral 8x22B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper