Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs Llama 3.2 90B
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 36.6 to 10.4.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87), Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109), Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1440 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | 1451 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41), Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | — |
| LMArena French | 1443 | — |
| LMArena German | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1446 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1422 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Llama 3.2 90B?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Llama 3.2 90B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.