Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Hunyuan Large Vision
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.3 to 46.7.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 37.0 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78), Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1307 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads
ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209), Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1257 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96), Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1269 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103), Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | 1250 |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28), Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1289 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1243 |
| LMArena French | 1486 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35), Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1250 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1279 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1250 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1253 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.