Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 47.3.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 37.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-08-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1269 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1255 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1265 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1238 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1257 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1262 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1286 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1273 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 1213 |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | 1195 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1261 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1279 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1245 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1266 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1281 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1265 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17.