Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Hunyuan Large Vision
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 53.1 to 39.9.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0675 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.23 | — |
| Results tracked | 28 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1308 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1439 | 1257 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | — |
Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1470 | 1268 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1252 |
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
Multimodal Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | 1180 |
Multilingual Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1421 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1287 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1243 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1251 |
Long Context Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1280 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1254 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (39.0 vs 38.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.