Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 4 31B IT vs Hunyuan Large Vision

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 31B IT Google

43.2

Rank #85 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.0

Rank #198 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 9 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 60.7 to 46.7.
  • Gemma 4 31B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Large Vision
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index43.237.0
Released2026-04-02—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.09—
Output $ / M tokens$0.34—
Results tracked3513

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.9 (#98), Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176)

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Coding14591307
LMArena WebDev1364—
SciCode43.4%—
WeirdML52.3%—
ALE-Bench925.5—

Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 26.4 (#119), Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160)

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Hard Prompts14481257
Kagi LLM Benchmark63.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)70.6%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles5%—
Thematic Generalization53%—
DTBench82.7%—
LMCA39.3%—
Surface Evolver Bench30.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index142.74—

Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.3 (#72), Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184)

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Math14641269
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202573.3%—

Knowledge Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#141), Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191)

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Expert14651250
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
SimpleQA Verified10.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—

Multimodal Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.0 (#32), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79)

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Vision12781180
LMArena Document1425—

Multilingual Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 54.0 (#52), Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216)

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Non-English14311236
LMArena Chinese14781289
LMArena Russian14621243
LMArena French1436—
LMArena Spanish1443—

Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.6 (#58), Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210)

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Instruction Following14331250

Long Context Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#67), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184)

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Longer Query14461279

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads

Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.7 (#92), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211)

BenchmarkGemma 4 31B ITHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Text14431263
LMArena Creative Writing14161250
LMArena Multi-Turn14521253
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1368—
EQ-Bench 41120—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Hunyuan Large Vision?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 31B IT or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?

Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Hunyuan Large Vision share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper