Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs MiniMax-M2.7
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 36.5 to 24.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 24.7% for MiniMax-M2.7.
- MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiniMax-M2.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 37.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 30 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.4 (#115)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1397 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#103)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
Reasoning MiniMax-M2.7 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.0 (#248)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | 24.7% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | 39.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1422 |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.84 |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#254)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1420 |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1443 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), MiniMax-M2.7: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), MiniMax-M2.7: 50.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1439 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | 1422 |
| LMArena German | 1462 | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | 1261 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1403 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), MiniMax-M2.7: 74.2 (#101)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1404 |
Long Context Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#94)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1419 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), MiniMax-M2.7: 59.1 (#107)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1404 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1413 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than MiniMax-M2.7?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (42.3 vs 41.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and MiniMax-M2.7 share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.