Model comparison

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B vs ERNIE 5.0 0110

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.1 to 49.0.
  • DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B and ERNIE 5.0 0110 specifications
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BERNIE 5.0 0110
ProviderDeepSeekBaidu
Noometry Index37.841.8
Released2025-01-20—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1320

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 36.8 (#202), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BERNIE 5.0 0110
BigCodeBench Instruct35.3%—
LiveBench Coding51.6%—
LMArena Coding—1455
BigCodeBench Complete49.9%—

Reasoning DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 24.9 (#156), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BERNIE 5.0 0110
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—10.3%
Thematic Generalization—41.7%
LiveBench Reasoning67.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1445
LiveBench Data Analysis55.9%—
LiveBench54.5%—

Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 36.0 (#176), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BERNIE 5.0 0110
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202551.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—
LMArena Math—1437
MATH Level 589.9%—

Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 30.7 (#225), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BERNIE 5.0 0110
GPQA Diamond55.7%—
LMArena Expert—1428

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Vision—1249

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Non-English—1436
LMArena Chinese—1512
LMArena French—1467
LMArena German—1460
LMArena Japanese—1382
LMArena Korean—1406
LMArena Russian—1446
LMArena Spanish—1473

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 68.2 (#190), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BERNIE 5.0 0110
LiveBench Instruction Following69.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1413

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: —, ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Longer Query—1422

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B: 49.0 (#194), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70BERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Text—1445
LMArena Creative Writing—1426
LMArena Multi-Turn—1434
LiveBench Language23.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B better than ERNIE 5.0 0110?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B or ERNIE 5.0 0110 better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B and ERNIE 5.0 0110 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B has 13 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper