Model comparison
MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
MiniMax
MetaSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher in 4 categories and Muse Glimmer in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Glimmer leads 38.8 to 25.9.
Side by side
| MiniMax-M2.7 | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 205K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 30 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1398 | 1355 |
| SciCode | 47% | 44.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1416 |
| WeirdML | 37% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 599.25 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 45.1% | — |
| ExploitBench | 13.3% | — |
| GBAEval | 0% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.6% | 2.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1396 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 24.7% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 39.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.85 | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1420 | 1417 |
| ProofBench | 3% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | 1386 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.9% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1441 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1383 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1421 | — |
| LMArena German | 1398 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1403 | — |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1375 |
Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1354 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1412 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax-M2.7 better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiniMax-M2.7 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.7 and Muse Glimmer share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.7 has 30 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.