Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Grok 4.3

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Grok 4.3 xAI

43.8

Rank #86 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 6 categories and Grok 4.3 in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.3 leads 35.9 to 17.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 55.2% for Grok 4.3.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.3
ProviderBaiduxAI
Noometry Index41.843.8
Released—2026-04-17
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked2040

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.3
LMArena Coding14551415
LMArena WebDev—1357
SciCode—47.3%
WeirdML—49.9%
ALE-Bench—944.17

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.3
GDP.pdf—8%
LMArena Search—1165
Vending-Bench 2—35.26

Reasoning Grok 4.3 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.3
NYT Connections (extended)10.3%55.2%
LMArena Hard Prompts14451396
CritPt—8%
Chess Puzzles—25%
Thematic Generalization41.7%—
DTBench—90.7%
LMCA—38.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.16
ForecastBench—60.3

Math Grok 4.3 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.3
LMArena Math14371388
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—42.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—14.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
ProofBench—11%

Knowledge Grok 4.3 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.3
LMArena Expert14281385
GPQA Diamond—88.8%
SimpleQA Verified—33.2%

Multimodal ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.3
LMArena Vision12491229
Blueprint-Bench 2—0%

Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.3
LMArena Non-English14361385
LMArena Chinese15121422
LMArena French14671412
LMArena German14601395
LMArena Japanese13821379
LMArena Korean14061356
LMArena Russian14461399
LMArena Spanish14731398

Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.3
LMArena Instruction Following14131366

Long Context Too close to call

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.3
LMArena Longer Query14221393

Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads

ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.0 0110Grok 4.3
LMArena Text14451397
LMArena Creative Writing14261380
LMArena Multi-Turn14341406
EQ-Bench 4—1075

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Grok 4.3?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Grok 4.3 better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 41.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Grok 4.3 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.3 has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper