Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs GLM-5V-Turbo
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 3 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 6 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 28.5 to 16.3.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GLM-5V-Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 43.1 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), GLM-5V-Turbo: 41.8 (#105)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1467 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1400 |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), GLM-5V-Turbo: 28.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1443 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
Math Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), GLM-5V-Turbo: 36.6 (#109)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1440 |
Knowledge Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1451 |
Multimodal Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.1 (#41)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | 1264 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1416 |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.2 (#69)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1488 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | 1443 |
| LMArena German | 1462 | 1422 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1432 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.1 (#75)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1422 |
Long Context Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1439 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.6 (#69)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1414 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1432 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than GLM-5V-Turbo?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (42.3 vs 41.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GLM-5V-Turbo share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.