Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen3 Max
Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3 Max in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 39.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 30.1% for Qwen3 Max.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 43.7 |
| Released | — | 2025-09-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Qwen3 Max: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |
Reasoning Qwen3 Max leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | 30.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1448 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.38 |
Math Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1446 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1455 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Qwen3 Max: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1478 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | 1449 |
| LMArena German | 1460 | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1462 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1419 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1438 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1446 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen3 Max?
Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen3 Max better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.0 vs 43.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen3 Max share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.