Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs Inkling-Small
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Inkling-Small leads 59.6 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling-Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 46.5 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 1.05M |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.45 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Inkling-Small leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1451 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1409 |
| SciCode | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Inkling-Small leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1423 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | 150.15 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 40.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 84% |
| CritPt | — | 8.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 18% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 6% |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math Inkling-Small leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1459 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 46.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 90% |
| ProofBench | — | 6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.5% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 19.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1442 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1235 |
Multilingual Inkling-Small leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1402 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1436 |
| LMArena German | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1428 |
Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1399 |
Long Context Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1401 |
Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling-Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1414 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1331 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1418 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1491 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Inkling-Small?
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Inkling-Small better for coding?
Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Inkling-Small share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.