Model comparison

Dolly 2.0-12b vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Dolly 2.0-12b Databricks

25.5

Rank #342 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

47.5

Rank #62 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 62.2 to 15.2.
  • Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Dolly 2.0-12b and Qwen3.6 Plus specifications
Dolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Plus
ProviderDatabricksAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.547.5
Released2023-04-112026-03-31
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$3
Results tracked1737

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Coding7761467
SWE-bench Verified—57.9%
LMArena WebDev—1461
SciCode—40.7%
ALE-Bench—670.15

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—5,115

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts8041449
Epoch Capabilities Index89.67147.65
NYT Connections (extended)—60.3%
CritPt—2.9%
Chess Puzzles—17%
Thematic Generalization—59.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
DTBench—81.9%
LMCA—33.1%
HellaSwag70.8%—
PIQA75.4%—
WinoGrande61.8%—

Math Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Math8711450
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—38.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—26.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—8.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Plus
GPQA Diamond—88.4%
SimpleQA Verified—44.1%
LMArena Expert—1454
ARC (AI2) Challenge39.6%—
BoolQ56.3%—
MMLU26.2%—
OpenBookQA39.2%—

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Non-English8361424
LMArena Chinese8361477
LMArena French—1455
LMArena German—1452
LMArena Japanese—1389
LMArena Korean—1379
LMArena Russian—1434
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following8141425

Long Context Not comparable

Dolly 2.0-12b: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Plus
CL-bench—20.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1439

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDolly 2.0-12bQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text8511437
LMArena Creative Writing8641404
LMArena Multi-Turn7401438

Frequently asked questions

Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper