Model comparison

Gemma 2 9B vs Inkling-Small

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 2 9B Google

25.9

Rank #341 Confirmed

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #63 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 9B scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling-Small leads 48.2 to 9.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.6% for Gemma 2 9B and 90% for Inkling-Small.

Side by side

Gemma 2 9B and Inkling-Small specifications
Gemma 2 9BInkling-Small
ProviderGoogleThinking Machines Lab
Noometry Index25.946.5
Released2024-06-242026-07-15
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—524K
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$0.45
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked3533

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Gemma 2 9B: 29.4 (#304), Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BInkling-Small
LMArena Coding11731451
LMArena WebDev—1409
SciCode—48.7%
BigCodeBench Instruct34.7%—
LiveBench Coding22.5%—
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%—

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Gemma 2 9B: 15.9 (#309), Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BInkling-Small
LMArena Hard Prompts11711423
Epoch Capabilities Index119.83150.15
ARC-AGI-2—40.1%
ARC-AGI-1—84%
CritPt—8.3%
Chess Puzzles—18%
LiveBench Reasoning15.2%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—6%
LiveBench Data Analysis36.4%—
LiveBench28.7%—
PIQA83.7%—

Math Inkling-Small leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.9 (#318), Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BInkling-Small
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.6%90%
LMArena Math11831459
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—46.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
ProofBench—6%
LiveBench Math19.8%—
MATH Level 521%—
GSM8K84.9%—

Knowledge Inkling-Small leads

Gemma 2 9B: 9.7 (#305), Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BInkling-Small
GPQA Diamond27.5%88.5%
LMArena Expert11471442
SimpleQA Verified—19.1%
BoolQ85.7%—
MMLU72.1%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 2 9B: —, Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BInkling-Small
LMArena Vision—1235

Multilingual Inkling-Small leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.6 (#238), Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BInkling-Small
LMArena Non-English11881402
LMArena Chinese11851465
LMArena French11901436
LMArena German11861405
LMArena Japanese11441405
LMArena Korean11371363
LMArena Russian12001391
LMArena Spanish12001428

Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads

Gemma 2 9B: 57.6 (#269), Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BInkling-Small
LMArena Instruction Following11781399
LiveBench Instruction Following52.6%—

Long Context Inkling-Small leads

Gemma 2 9B: 36.3 (#233), Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BInkling-Small
LMArena Longer Query11971401

Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads

Gemma 2 9B: 32.1 (#281), Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 2 9BInkling-Small
LMArena Text12071414
LMArena Creative Writing12061331
EQ-Bench Creative Writing8411491
LMArena Multi-Turn11931418
LiveBench Language25.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 2 9B better than Inkling-Small?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 2 9B or Inkling-Small better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 29.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 9B and Inkling-Small share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 9B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper