Model comparison
Dolly 2.0-12b vs GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
DatabricksSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5 Pro in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5 Pro leads 38.9 to 15.3.
- Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 46.4 |
| Released | 2023-04-11 | 2025-10-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 272K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $120 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332), GPT-5 Pro: 44.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 60.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 776 | — |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.31 |
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316), GPT-5 Pro: 38.9 (#62)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | 150.28 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 18.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 61.6% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 76.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 70.2% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 18.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |
Math GPT-5 Pro leads
Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251), GPT-5 Pro: 48.5 (#63)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 55.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 19.5% |
| LMArena Math | 871 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: —, GPT-5 Pro: 56.7 (#42)
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 31.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296), GPT-5 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304), GPT-5 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311), GPT-5 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | GPT-5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than GPT-5 Pro?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Dolly 2.0-12b or GPT-5 Pro better for coding?
GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and GPT-5 Pro share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5 Pro has 12.