Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Yi-34B
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance SeedSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 40.2 to 7.5.
- Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 27.8 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1112 |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1104 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.39 |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1114 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1061 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Yi-34B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1176 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1081 |
| LMArena German | 1442 | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 993 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 959 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1050 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1070 |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1091 |
Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1113 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Yi-34B?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Yi-34B better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Yi-34B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.