Model comparison

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Yi-34B

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 4 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 7.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 87.9% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 14.7% for Yi-34B.

Side by side

Kimi K2.7 Code and Yi-34B specifications
Kimi K2.7 CodeYi-34B
ProviderMoonshot AI01.AI
Noometry Index43.327.8
Released2026-06-122023-11-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.95—
Output $ / M tokens$4—
Results tracked1923

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeYi-34B
DeepSWE30.5%—
FrontierCode30.1%—
LMArena WebDev1473—
SciCode47.5%—
WeirdML54.1%—
LMArena Coding—1112
ALE-Bench886.23—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122), Yi-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeYi-34B
APEX-Agents37.6%—
GBAEval0.9%—
Vending-Bench 25,083—

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeYi-34B
Epoch Capabilities Index149.97117.39
SimpleBench57.9%—
CritPt10%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1104
Surface Evolver Bench48.8%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeYi-34B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)54%—
FrontierMath Tier 412.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
LMArena Math—1114
MATH Level 5—5.1%
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeYi-34B
GPQA Diamond87.9%14.7%
SimpleQA Verified36.5%—
LMArena Expert—1061
MMLU—76.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeYi-34B
LMArena Non-English—1079
LMArena Chinese—1176
LMArena French—1081
LMArena German—1042
LMArena Japanese—993
LMArena Korean—959
LMArena Russian—1050
LMArena Spanish—1070

Instruction Following Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeYi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following—1091

Long Context Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeYi-34B
LMArena Longer Query—1094

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeYi-34B
LMArena Text—1129
LMArena Creative Writing—1108
LMArena Multi-Turn—1113

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Yi-34B?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Yi-34B better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Yi-34B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper