Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

43.2

Rank #96 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 62.9 to 27.6.
  • Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 Pro and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
Seed 2.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderByteDance SeedMicrosoft
Noometry Index43.227.9
Released2026-02-142024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.50—
Output $ / M tokens$3—
Results tracked2035

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding14721093
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14531072
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
Thematic Generalization57.1%—
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math14391111
LiveBench Math—15.7%

Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert14401045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multimodal Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Vision1274—

Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14411021
LMArena Chinese14891021
LMArena French14711076
LMArena German14421044
LMArena Japanese1408935
LMArena Korean1411905
LMArena Russian14491022
LMArena Spanish14601085

Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14141053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14281044

Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text14481073
LMArena Creative Writing14061037
LMArena Multi-Turn14411018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper