Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus DeepSeek

43.1

Rank #97 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher in 7 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads 61.0 to 27.6.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
DeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderDeepSeekMicrosoft
Noometry Index43.127.9
Released2025-09-222024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window164K—
Max output147K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.27—
Output $ / M tokens$1—
Results tracked1635

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 42.0 (#113), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding14261093
SciCode40.6%—
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
ALE-Bench745.17—
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 26.4 (#133), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14261072
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.4%—
CritPt1.7%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
DTBench81.3%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
LMCA28.6%—
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 38.5 (#137), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math14021111
LiveBench Math—15.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —, Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert—1045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.1 (#92), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14071021
LMArena Russian14361022
LMArena Chinese—1021
LMArena French—1076
LMArena German—1044
LMArena Japanese—935
LMArena Korean—905
LMArena Spanish—1085

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.0 (#106), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14041053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.4 (#97), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14211044

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.0 (#92), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.1-TerminusPhi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text14191073
LMArena Creative Writing14031037
LMArena Multi-Turn14111018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.0 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper