Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs Gemma 3 4B

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

43.2

Rank #96 Confirmed

Gemma 3 4B Google

28.1

Rank #326 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 3 4B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 40.2 to 11.8.
  • Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
  • Seed 2.0 Pro accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.
  • Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 Pro and Gemma 3 4B specifications
Seed 2.0 ProGemma 3 4B
ProviderByteDance SeedGoogle
Noometry Index43.228.1
Released2026-02-142025-03-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K131K
Max output128K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.04
Output $ / M tokens$3$0.08
Results tracked2022

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGemma 3 4B
LMArena Coding14721230

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: —, Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGemma 3 4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—19.6%

Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGemma 3 4B
LMArena Hard Prompts14531253
Kagi LLM Benchmark—25.2%
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
Thematic Generalization57.1%—
DTBench—50.9%
LMCA—2.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—116.02

Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGemma 3 4B
LMArena Math14391239
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.5%

Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGemma 3 4B
LMArena Expert14401223
GPQA Diamond—23.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—6.4%

Multimodal Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Gemma 3 4B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGemma 3 4B
LMArena Vision1274—

Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGemma 3 4B
LMArena Non-English14411273
LMArena German14421281
LMArena Russian14491294
LMArena Chinese1489—
LMArena French1471—
LMArena Japanese1408—
LMArena Korean1411—
LMArena Spanish1460—

Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGemma 3 4B
LMArena Instruction Following14141239

Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGemma 3 4B
LMArena Longer Query14281273

Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGemma 3 4B
LMArena Text14481291
LMArena Creative Writing14061271
LMArena Multi-Turn14411255
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1068

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Gemma 3 4B?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 23× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or Gemma 3 4B?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Gemma 3 4B better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Seed 2.0 Pro does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Gemma 3 4B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 4B has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper