Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Llama 3.2 90B
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 39.3 to 11.1.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 27.5 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1439 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | — |
| LMArena French | 1471 | — |
| LMArena German | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Llama 3.2 90B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.