Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Gemini 1.0 Pro
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance Seed
GoogleSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 39.3 to 9.3.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 27.3 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2023-12-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1108 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 55.5% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.4% |
Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1109 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 45.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.04 |
Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1132 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 1.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.2% |
Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1059 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 34% |
| MMLU | — | 70% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1124 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1145 |
| LMArena German | 1442 | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1119 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1114 |
Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1132 |
Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1131 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1139 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.