Noometry

Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs GPT-4

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

42.5

Rank #97 Confirmed

GPT-4 OpenAI

28.9

Rank #308 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and GPT-4 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 63.0 to 35.0.
  • Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $60 for GPT-4.
  • Seed 2.0 Pro accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 8K.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 ProGPT-4
ProviderByteDance SeedOpenAI
Noometry Index42.528.9
Released2026-02-142023-03-14
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window256K8K
Max output128K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$30
Output $ / M tokens$3$60
Results tracked2038

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 42.9 (#84), GPT-4: 31.2 (#277)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4
LMArena Coding14721254
WeirdML—12.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct—46%
BigCodeBench Complete—57.2%
HumanEval+—79.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: —, GPT-4: —

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4
METR Time Horizons—36.1%

Reasoning Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 23.1 (#167), GPT-4: 17.3 (#285)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4
LMArena Hard Prompts14531241
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
Chess Puzzles—4%
Thematic Generalization57.1%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
DTBench—62.7%
LMCA—17.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—75.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.88
ForecastBench—57.8
HellaSwag—95.3%
WinoGrande—87.5%

Math Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#110), GPT-4: 10.1 (#304)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4
LMArena Math14401269
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.1%
MATH Level 5—23%
GSM8K—92%

Knowledge Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.6 (#119), GPT-4: 18.4 (#277)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4
LMArena Expert14401211
GPQA Diamond—35.7%
MMLU—86.4%
TriviaQA—84.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.8 (#34), GPT-4: —

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4
LMArena Vision1275—

Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.8 (#37), GPT-4: 40.8 (#210)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4
LMArena Non-English14421246
LMArena Chinese14901242
LMArena French14701282
LMArena German14431251
LMArena Japanese14081209
LMArena Korean14121184
LMArena Russian14501251
LMArena Spanish14601261

Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.7 (#86), GPT-4: 65.5 (#217)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4
LMArena Instruction Following14141241

Long Context Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#85), GPT-4: 37.7 (#207)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4
LMArena Longer Query14281244

Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 63.0 (#66), GPT-4: 35.0 (#263)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProGPT-4
LMArena Text14481263
LMArena Creative Writing14061244
LMArena Multi-Turn14411257
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—752

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than GPT-4?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or GPT-4?

Seed 2.0 Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; GPT-4 lists at $30 and $60.

Is Seed 2.0 Pro or GPT-4 better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Seed 2.0 Pro does, with 256K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and GPT-4 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4 has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper