Model comparison
GPT-4 vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 34.9.
Side by side
| GPT-4 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2023-03-14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 8K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $60 | — |
| Results tracked | 38 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1254 | 1418 |
| WeirdML | 12.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| METR Time Horizons | 36.1% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1241 | 1416 |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 12% | — |
| DTBench | 62.7% | — |
| LMCA | 17.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 75.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.89 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.8 | — |
| HellaSwag | 95.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.5% | — |
Math Not comparable
GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1269 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 23% | — |
| GSM8K | 92% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 35.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | — |
| MMLU | 86.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 84.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1246 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena French | 1283 | — |
| LMArena German | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1184 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1261 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1241 | 1397 |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1244 | 1404 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1244 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1257 | 1422 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 752 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4 better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-4 or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.