Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.7 Code in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.9 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 95.6% for Kimi K2.7 Code.
  • Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Noometry Index27.343.3
Released2023-12-132026-06-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked2419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
DeepSWE—30.5%
FrontierCode—30.1%
LMArena WebDev—1473
SciCode—47.5%
WeirdML—54.1%
LMArena Coding1108—
ALE-Bench—886.23
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
APEX-Agents—37.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—5,083

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04149.97
SimpleBench—57.9%
CritPt—10%
Chess Puzzles—21%
LMArena Hard Prompts1109—
DTBench45.9%—
Surface Evolver Bench—48.8%

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%95.6%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—54%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
LMArena Math1132—
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond34%87.9%
SimpleQA Verified—36.5%
LMArena Expert1059—
MMLU70%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Non-English1138—
LMArena Chinese1124—
LMArena French1145—
LMArena German1125—
LMArena Japanese1023—
LMArena Russian1186—
LMArena Spanish1119—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Instruction Following1114—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Longer Query1132—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProKimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text1149—
LMArena Creative Writing1131—
LMArena Multi-Turn1139—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper