Model comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Wizardlm 70b

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek

52.8

Rank #38 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 66.7 to 32.2.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Wizardlm 70b specifications
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashWizardlm 70b
ProviderDeepSeekMicrosoft
Noometry Index52.833.0
Released2026-09-09—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked3712

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.9 (#32), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding15061081
LMArena WebDev1619—
SciCode51.9%—
ALE-Bench1,092—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 31.2 (#69), Wizardlm 70b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashWizardlm 70b
APEX-Agents39.5%—
GDP.pdf19.8%—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 50.2 (#36), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts14831079
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
CritPt14.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles43%—
DTBench89.9%—
LMCA47%—
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.9—

Math DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 66.7 (#25), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math14771116
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)67.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.3%—
ProofBench54%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 57.9 (#38), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashWizardlm 70b
GPQA Diamond89.8%—
LMArena Expert1506—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 39.1 (#61), Wizardlm 70b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashWizardlm 70b
LMArena Vision1277—
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.0 (#35), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English14481078
LMArena Chinese14971052
LMArena German14841083
LMArena Russian14711155
LMArena French1452—
LMArena Japanese1412—
LMArena Korean1452—
LMArena Spanish1459—

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.3 (#26), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following14741093

Long Context DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#47), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query14751097

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.4 (#48), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text14621120
LMArena Creative Writing14351149
LMArena Multi-Turn14571108
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1540—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Wizardlm 70b?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.9 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 37 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper