Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.6

Rank #200 Confirmed

Gemini 2.0 Pro Google

39.1

Rank #173 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) scores higher in 2 categories and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads 39.5 to 29.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 17.8% for DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and 35.6% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.
  • DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Gemini 2.0 Pro specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemini 2.0 Pro
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Noometry Index37.639.1
Released2024-09-062025-02-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2214

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.7 (#281), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemini 2.0 Pro
Aider Polyglot17.8%35.6%
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
LiveBench Coding—63.5%
LMArena Coding1309—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 25.6 (#145), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemini 2.0 Pro
EnigmaEval—0.7%
LiveBench Reasoning—60.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts1289—
LiveBench Data Analysis—68%
Epoch Capabilities Index—135.06
LiveBench—65.1%

Math Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 35.9 (#177), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemini 2.0 Pro
LiveBench Math—71%
LMArena Math1288—
MATH Level 5—83.5%

Knowledge Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.8 (#193), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemini 2.0 Pro
GPQA Diamond—65.7%
Confabulations—18.4%
LMArena Expert1266—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.5 (#193), Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemini 2.0 Pro
LMArena Non-English1273—
LMArena Chinese1318—
LMArena French1289—
LMArena German1258—
LMArena Japanese1228—
LMArena Korean1209—
LMArena Russian1289—
LMArena Spanish1248—

Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.5 (#194), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemini 2.0 Pro
LiveBench Instruction Following—83.4%
LMArena Instruction Following1280—

Long Context DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#174), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemini 2.0 Pro
Fiction.LiveBench—41.7%
LMArena Longer Query1301—

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 49.8 (#187), Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Gemini 2.0 Pro
LMArena Text1294—
LMArena Creative Writing1285—
LMArena Multi-Turn1297—
LiveBench Language—44.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper