Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Pro vs Mercury
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 75.5 to 65.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mercury | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187), Mercury: 38.7 (#170)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 35.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1322 |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198), Mercury: 17.5 (#293)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 21.6% |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 60.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1285 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 68% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.06 | — |
| LiveBench | 65.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100), Mercury: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 71% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 83.5% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167), Mercury: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Pro: —, Mercury: 41.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1260 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59), Mercury: 65.2 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 83.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1239 |
Long Context Mercury leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292), Mercury: 38.4 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1266 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Pro leads
Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165), Mercury: 46.2 (#221)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Pro | Mercury |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1191 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1282 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro better than Mercury?
Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Pro or Mercury better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.8 vs 38.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Pro and Mercury share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.