Model comparison

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs Qwen3 32B

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) DeepSeek

37.6

Rank #200 Confirmed

Qwen3 32B Alibaba (Qwen)

39.2

Rank #172 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 32B in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 32B leads 37.7 to 31.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 17.8% for DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and 40% for Qwen3 32B.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Qwen3 32B specifications
DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 32B
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.639.2
Released2024-09-062025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked2226

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 32B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.7 (#281), Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 32B
Aider Polyglot17.8%40%
LMArena Coding13091358
SciCode—35.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct48.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.2%—
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+74.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): —, Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 32B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—48.7%

Reasoning DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 25.6 (#145), Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 32B
LMArena Hard Prompts12891334
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—5%
DTBench—67.5%
LMCA—17.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.51

Math Qwen3 32B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 35.9 (#177), Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 32B
LMArena Math12881399
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—66.9%

Knowledge Qwen3 32B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.8 (#193), Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 32B
LMArena Expert12661362
GPQA Diamond—65.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.9%

Multilingual Qwen3 32B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.5 (#193), Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 32B
LMArena Non-English12731317
LMArena Chinese13181357
LMArena German12581341
LMArena Russian12891311
LMArena French1289—
LMArena Japanese1228—
LMArena Korean1209—
LMArena Spanish1248—

Instruction Following Qwen3 32B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.5 (#194), Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 32B
LMArena Instruction Following12801305

Long Context Qwen3 32B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#174), Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 32B
LMArena Longer Query13011327
Fiction.LiveBench—74.2%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 32B leads

DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 49.8 (#187), Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024)Qwen3 32B
LMArena Text12941340
LMArena Creative Writing12851297
LMArena Multi-Turn12971331

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and Qwen3 32B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper