Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
TencentSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 35.6 to 8.7.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1319 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1308 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1273 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1305 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1278 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1309 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1303 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.