Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Llama 13b
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 50.2 to 13.8.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 24.4 |
| Released | — | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 683 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | 781 |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 753 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Llama 13b?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Llama 13b better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Llama 13b share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.