Model comparison

DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Nova 2 Lite

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek LLM 67B DeepSeek

24.9

Rank #347 Confirmed

Nova 2 Lite Amazon

39.7

Rank #161 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Nova 2 Lite in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nova 2 Lite leads 43.0 to 7.0.
  • DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek LLM 67B and Nova 2 Lite specifications
DeepSeek LLM 67BNova 2 Lite
ProviderDeepSeekAmazon
Noometry Index24.939.7
Released2023-11-292025-12-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—64K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked1519

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nova 2 Lite leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278), Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Coding10961385

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek LLM 67B: —, Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BNova 2 Lite
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.1%

Reasoning Nova 2 Lite leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304), Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Hard Prompts10701364
Chess Puzzles0%—
Epoch Capabilities Index110.5—

Math Nova 2 Lite leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324), Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Math11081359
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250.8%—
MATH Level 56.4%—

Knowledge Nova 2 Lite leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313), Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BNova 2 Lite
GPQA Diamond24.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.1%
LMArena Expert—1358

Multilingual Nova 2 Lite leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267), Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Non-English10731337
LMArena Chinese11321364
LMArena French—1381
LMArena German—1343
LMArena Japanese—1271
LMArena Korean—1284
LMArena Russian—1343
LMArena Spanish—1373

Instruction Following Nova 2 Lite leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277), Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Instruction Following10791335

Long Context Nova 2 Lite leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265), Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Longer Query10921335

Writing & Preference Nova 2 Lite leads

DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282), Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek LLM 67BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Text11051362
LMArena Creative Writing10671291
LMArena Multi-Turn10821338

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Nova 2 Lite?

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Nova 2 Lite better for coding?

Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Nova 2 Lite share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2 Lite has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper