Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 35.6 to 10.2.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1319 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1308 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1273 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1305 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1278 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1309 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1303 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.