Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Gemma 2 2b IT
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 32.6 to 9.3.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Gemma 2 2b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 33.1 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1112 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1113 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |
Math Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1135 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1096 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1132 |
| LMArena French | — | 1157 |
| LMArena German | — | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1055 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1140 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1118 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1130 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1156 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1147 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1118 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Gemma 2 2b IT?
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Gemma 2 2b IT share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.