Model comparison
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B vs Wizardlm 13b
Wizardlm 13b has enough public results to be ranked (#274); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
MicrosoftSide by side
| DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.0 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2023-11-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek Coder 1.3B leads
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: 31.2 (#287), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 22.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 29.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 60.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 63.6 | — |
| WinoGrande | 53.3% | — |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |
| GSM8K | 4.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 25.4% | — |
| MMLU | 25.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1048 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 1.3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B better than Wizardlm 13b?
Wizardlm 13b has enough public results to be ranked (#274); DeepSeek Coder 1.3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is DeepSeek Coder 1.3B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.2 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 1.3B and Wizardlm 13b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.